Learning with disabilities


LD early identification

The purpose of early identification is(birth-21 years), who need early
to determine which children haveintervention or special education
developmental problems that may beservices. Screening tools are not
obstacles to learning or that placeintended for diagnosis, placement, and
children at risk. Development ineducational planning. Careful
infants, toddlers, and preschoolers isconsideration of reliability, validity,
characterized by broad variability instandardization, cultural and linguistic
rates and patterns of maturation. Forsensitivity, and relevance of screening
some children, differences and delays ininstruments and procedures is required
abilities are temporary and are resolvedfor appropriate selection, use, and
during the normal course of development.interpretation. The NJCLD supports the
For other children, delays may persistrecommendations by the Learning
in different domains of functioning,Disabilities Roundtable in 2002 that
necessitating the child's referral for"all preschoolers should be screened to
targeted screening and/or comprehensiveassess early language and reading skill
evaluation. At present, no cleardevelopment just as they are for vision
distinction can be made in the earlyand hearing" (p. 1).
years between the children whoseRisk indicators and protective factors.
problems may persist from those who willA range of environmental, biological,
make adequate progress with time.genetic, and perinatal conditions may be
Therefore, young children whoassociated with adverse developmental
demonstrate difficulties in earlyoutcomes (see Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000)
development may or may not be at riskand may be risk indicators (i.e.,
for LD; nevertheless, screening,warning signs) for LD.Also, advances in
evaluation, enhanced learningmedical technology have kept an
opportunities, and possibly interventionincreasing number of fragile children
services should be provided.It is not inalive, and these children often are at
the child's best interest to “wait andrisk for developmental and later
see” or hope that the child willeducational problems. Such risk
“grow out of” his or her problems.indicators, especially when several are
Conversely, it is important to guardpresent, warrant careful monitoring of a
against the premature identification ofchild’s development and signal the
a disability, especially if high qualityneed to ensure high quality learning
learning opportunities have not beenopportunities for this population.
provided.Children who do not respond adequately
It is often during the early years thatto these opportunities may be at
families and caregivers first suspect aincreased risk for LD. Furthermore,
problem and may share their concernsyoung children with identified
with qualified professionals. However,disabilities (e.g., cerebral palsy) also
some families initially may deny themay be at risk for LD. However, risk
existence of a problem because they areindicators do not always predict which
fearful of, or threatened by, itschildren will have future learning
possibilities and consequences. Familyproblems. Risk indicators must be
cooperation is critical to earlyconsidered within the context of typical
identification. Thus, professionals mustdevelopmental expectations. For example,
recognize and be sensitive toan inability to follow one-step
differences in family responses,directions is not a risk indicator for a
including cultural differences in6-month-old, but is for a 4-year-old,
viewing and addressing a disability, andespecially in combination with other
provide appropriate support.risk indicators, such as poor fine motor
The identification process includes (1)coordination.
screening, (2) examination for theProtective factors that reduce risk and
presence of risk indicators andfoster resilience can buffer children
protective factors, (3) systematicand families from circumstances that
observations, and, if indicated, (4) aplace them at risk. Risk indicators
comprehensive evaluation. An effectiveinteract with protective factors in
early identification program must takeunique ways for each child. For example,
into account the numerous biological,some children with a history of birth
environmental, and cultural factors thatcomplications may exhibit typical
may influence the course of a child’sdevelopmental patterns and require few
development. Information from theif any special services, whereas other
identification process is the basis forchildren without such histories may
making decisions about the need forstruggle to learn and may require formal
further services and supports.assessment and intervention.Likewise,
Screening. The purpose of screening ischildren who may have multiple risk
to determine if additional evaluation isindicators may not demonstrate learning
required and in what developmentalproblems if they receive strong
domains. Examples of large scaleculturally and developmentally
state-wide screening programs includeappropriate early learning experiences.
Universal Newborn and Infant HearingThe two lists below, though not
Screening and Child Find, a component ofall-inclusive, identify possible risk
IDEA ’04 that requires states to haveindicators and protective factors for LD
a system to identify, locate, andamong infants, toddlers, and
evaluate all children with disabilitiespreschoolers.



1 A B C 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93