Dyslexia: Is the Shoe Perhaps on the Wrong Foot?

Reading is the most important skill that a child mustEach Kana syllabary has 46 basic letters compared to
acquire at school, because one must learn to read toour 26.
be able to read to learn. The implication of this is thatDIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE NOT THE
the child who is a poor reader will usually also be aEQUIVALENT OF A NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
poor learner.It is also important to note that differences in brain
Unfortunately poor reading skills, and therefore poorstructures do not necessarily equal brain disorders.
learning skills, have become a reality for an alarmingDifferences between dyslexics' brains and those of
number of people. The $14 million National Adultnormal readers are not necessarily the cause of a
Literacy Survey of 1993 found that even thoughreading difficulty. Such differences can well be the
most adults in this survey had finished high school,EFFECT of a learning difficulty.
96% of them could not read, write, and figure wellLatest neurological findings - for example through the
enough to go to college. Even more to the point,work of Michael Merzenich of the University of San
25% were plainly unable to read.Francisco - show that, while certain areas of the brain
Even more alarming is that reading difficulties are notare designated for specific purposes, brain cells and
limited to people who are environmentally, culturallycortical maps do change in response to learning. An
or economically disadvantaged. Many children comeinteresting study in London has found that an area of
from good homes, go to good schools and scorethe brain associated with navigation was larger in
average to above average on IQ tests. Yet, theyLondon's famed taxi drivers than in other people. The
battle to learn to read, and many never succeed.drivers' brains have adapted to help them store a
Children with reading difficulties share a number ofdetailed mental map of the city, shrinking in one area
common symptoms. They are inclined to reverseto allow growth in another.
letters or words, to omit letters, to lose their place,The tendency over the past nearly a century has
to remember little of what they have read, or tobeen to try and fit the dyslexia shoe on the foot of
read with poor comprehension. These children arethe children who fail to learn to read. All efforts to
considered to suffer from a learning disability (LD),make this shoe fit have failed. If a shoe does not fit
commonly called dyslexia.one foot, shouldn't we try it on the other foot?
According to the Orton Dyslexia Society at least onePUTTING THE SHOE ON THE OTHER FOOT
in every ten of otherwise able people has seriousWhen a person fails to learn something, there are at
dyslexia problems. The Foundation of Children withleast two possible reasons why he failed. The first is
Learning Disabilities states that learning-disabledthat there may be something wrong with the person.
children represent more than ten million of the totalThe second is that there may be something wrong
population of the U.S.A. Estimates of learning-disabledwith the way in which he was taught. Unfortunately
students being dyslexic vary between 70 and 80most people have so far jumped to the very hasty
percent.conclusion that, when the otherwise normal child fails
FIND THE CAUSE TO FIND A CUREto learn to read, it must be the first possibility that
Most problems can only be solved if one knows whatapplies.
causes the problem. A disease such as scurvyWhen teaching, it is imperative to take note of the
claimed the lives of thousands of seamen during longfact that learning is a stratified process. One step
sea voyages. The disease was cured fairly quicklyneeds to be mastered well enough before
once the cause was discovered, viz. a Vitamin Csubsequent steps can be learned. This means that
deficiency. A viable point of departure in LD researchthere is a sequence involved in learning. It is like
would therefore be to ask the question, "What is theclimbing a ladder; if you miss one of the rungs of the
CAUSE of dyslexia?"ladder, you will fall off. If you miss out on one of the
The idea that dyslexia is a certifiable biologicalimportant steps in the learning process, you will not
disorder, a physical problem that could be diagnosedbe able to master subsequent steps.
and treated accordingly, gained credence during theA simple and practical example of this is the fact that
1960s and 1970s, giving rise to an armada of theories.one has to learn to count before it becomes possible
One such a theory states that dyslexia is the resultto learn to add and subtract. If one tried to teach a
when the link between the language, hearing andchild to add and subtract before he had been taught
comprehension centers of the brain is somehowto count, one would quickly discover that no amount
misconfigured during fetal development. Anotherof effort would ever succeed in teaching the child
theory states that dyslexia is caused by "faultythese skills. Conceivably people who abide by the
wiring in the brain," whereas another holds that alearning disabilities idea would then conclude that the
subtle impairment of vision may be responsible, whilechild suffered from a neurological dysfunction, or
yet another believes that a cerebellar-vestibularfrom "dyscalculia," overlooking that the ability to
dysfunction may be responsible for the learningcount must be acquired FIRST, BEFORE it becomes
disability. All these theories - most of them blamingpossible to learn to add and subtract.
some difference in structure between the brain ofThis principle is also of great importance on the
the dyslexic and that of the so-called normal reader -sports field. If we go to a soccer field to watch a
have lead to nothing at all. Despite all these theoriessoccer coach at work, we shall soon find that he
and all the intervention efforts based on them, notspends much time drilling his players on basic skills, like
to mention the vast amounts of money expended inheading, passing, dribbling, kicking, etc. The players
the process, the numbers of dyslexics continue towho are most proficient at these basic skills usually
escalate.turn out to be the best players in the actual game
Except for the fact that proof of a neurologicalsituation.
deficit still eludes the researchers, this theory leavesIn the same way, there are also certain skills and
many questions unanswered. If dyslexia has aknowledge that a child must acquire FIRST, BEFORE
neurological basis, why is this supposedlyit becomes possible for him to become a good
non-contagious "ailment" on the increase? Comparereader. Basic skills like concentration, visual
the present situation with, for example, that of adiscrimination, accurate perception and memorizing,
century ago. In 1910 the literacy rate in the U.S.A.skills of association, auditory memory and lateral
was so high it was predicted, "the public schools will ininterpretation are all functions that form the
a short time practically eliminate illiteracy." In 1935, afoundation of good reading and spelling. Until a child
survey of the 375,000 men working in the Civilianhas mastered these basic skills first, reading will
Conservation Corps - a government-sponsored workremain a closed - or at most half-open - book to him.
project to provide employment - found an illiteracyTeaching these basic skills used to form part of the
rate of 1.9 percent. It is most noteworthy that thiseducational system for many centuries, but have
last figure was found among men primarily of lowsince been removed from Western education by
socio-economic status. It is even more noteworthy"innovative" educators such as John Dewey and his
that the illiteracy rates of the first half of thecohorts. In this way the epidemic that is now called
twentieth century reflected, for the most part,"dyslexia" was created.
people who had never had the advantage ofAlready in 1974, in "Reading Teacher," Bateman
schooling.suggested that the term "learning disabilities" be
It is also impossible to explain how a neurologicalreplaced by "teaching disabilities." The focus, he said,
dysfunction can be more prevalent in specific areasshould be on the inadequate skills of the adults who
or countries. While the National Commission onare supposed to teach the children, instead of on
Excellence in 1983 warned that the American nationblaming the children of mysterious brain dysfunctions.
was "at risk," remedial reading facilities were notIn 1987 Dr. Thomas Armstrong coined the word
needed at all in Japan due to the rarity of reading"dysteachia" to refer to children suffering from
problems. Some would argue that reading problems"pedagogical illness" or inappropriate teaching
were virtually nonexistent in Japan because theirstrategies.
written language is easier than our Latin alphabet.Perhaps it is time that we investigate the possibility
That, however, is simply not true. The Japanesethat Bateman and Armstrong may have been correct
Kanji ideograms consist of 1,850 characters. Inwhen they said that the shoe was on the wrong
addition there are two Kana syllabaries, which - likefoot.
our Latin alphabet - use symbols to represent sounds.